全球教席课堂第67讲
题目：The Love for International Organizations (“爱恨情仇”：国际组织之于国际法律人)
时间：2023年5月25日（周四）15:00-17:00
ZOOM ID：830 4187 2057
PASSWORD：581783
开讲学者：Jean d’Aspremont （法国巴黎政治学院法学教授、英国曼彻斯特大学法学教授）
主持人：张康乐（pg电子游戏官网官方网站助理教授）
评议人：Işıl Aral（土耳其科克大学助理教授）
赖华夏(pg电子游戏官网官方网站国际关系学院助理教授)
开讲学者简介：
让·达斯普蒙（Jean d’Aspremont）是法国巴黎政治学院国际法教授，同时兼任英国曼彻斯特大学国际公法教授。他是“剑桥国际法和比较法研究”系列丛书的总编辑，也是“牛津国际组织法”（OXIO）数据库的负责人和“梅兰·席尔国际法研究”系列丛书编辑。他撰写过大量有关国际法问题的文章，作品已经被翻译成多种语言，包括西班牙语、葡萄牙语、俄语、汉语普通话、印地语、日语和波斯语。
Jean d’Aspremont is Professor of International Law at Sciences Po School of Law. He also holds a chair of Public International Law at the University of Manchester. He is General Editor of the Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law,Director of Oxford International Organizations (OXIO) and series editor of the Melland Schill Studies in International Law. He has written extensively on questions of international law. His work has been translated in several languages including Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, Japanese and Persian.
讲座摘要：
尽管近几十年来国际组织一直备受批评，但在国际法律人的实践、观念、认知、想象和情感世界里，国际组织依然占据着中心位置。本场讲座将重点关注国际组织表现出来的形象，如关心人民、展现权力的所在、知识丰富、将历史浪漫化、提供共同的经验标准、将世界文本化、为不满情绪提供并组织空间、扩大国际律师的研究领域以及拥有很多秘密等。让·达斯普蒙教授将通过对以上形象的研究，探明国际法律人对国际组织充满热情的原因，并阐释国际组织在国际法律思想和实践中所具有的中心地位及其缘由。
Albeit the object of compelling criticisms in recent decades, international organizations continue to occupy a very central place in the practical, conceptual, cognitive, imaginary, and emotional universe of international lawyers. This presentation argues that the resilient centrality of international organizations in international legal thought and practice is the manifestation of international lawyers’ love for such institutions. This presentation’s main aim is to provide an account of the drivers that inform international lawyers’ love for international organizations with a view to elucidating what lies behind the centrality of international organizations in international legal thought and practice. Among the drivers of international lawyers’ love for international organizations, attention is paid to their representations as taking care of people, as showing where to look for power, as knowing so much, as romanticizing history, as providing a shared standard of experience, as textualizing the universe, as providing and organizing space for discontent, as expanding international lawyers’ field of study, and as holding many secrets.